MONROVIA, LIBERIA – The Ministry of Justice’s April 23, 2026 press release was intended to reassure the public that President Joseph Nyuma Boakai’s administration remains committed to establishing the War and Economic Crimes Court. Instead, it exposed a troubling reality: Liberia is still trapped in excuses, paperwork, institutional finger-pointing, and avoidable delays over one of the most important justice processes in the nation’s history. For victims of war crimes and economic plunder, patience has long expired.

Justice Minister Cllr. Oswald Tweh sought to dismiss claims by Dr. Jallah A. Barbu, Executive Director of the Office for the Establishment of the War and Economic Crimes Court for Liberia (OWECC-L), that the Ministry is impeding progress. But Dr. Barbu’s concerns should not be brushed aside. They should be treated as a warning signal from the very institution established to move this historic process forward. When the head of OWECC-L raises concerns publicly, Liberia must listen carefully.

Dr. Barbu’s claim is important because it reflects the frustration many Liberians already feel: that successive governments praise accountability in speeches but hesitate when action is required. If the institution charged with preparing the court says progress is being obstructed, then the Boakai administration must urgently address those concerns with transparency, not defensive statements. Justice delayed in Liberia has too often become justice denied.

The Ministry says multiple draft bills are undergoing technical review and harmonization before submission to the Legislature. While legal precision matters, Liberia cannot allow endless consultations to become a burial ground for accountability. The country has had years of recommendations, international support, expert reports, and public demands. The legal road map has existed long enough. What Liberia now needs is political courage.

President Boakai must understand that fully supporting OWECC-L is not optional; it is a moral and national duty. His administration came to power promising rescue, integrity, and a break from the failures of the past. Supporting the War and Economic Crimes Court is one of the clearest tests of whether those promises were genuine. A president who claims reform cannot remain neutral on justice.

The civil conflicts that devastated Liberia were not abstract political events. Liberia’s two brutal civil wars are widely estimated to have claimed around 250,000 lives, while countless others were wounded, displaced, orphaned, or psychologically scarred for life. They were years of slaughter, rape, mutilation, torture, child soldier recruitment, and mass terror. Entire communities were burned to the ground, families were erased, and children grew up amid gunfire instead of classrooms.

The destruction of human life was matched by the destruction of national property and institutions. Roads, schools, hospitals, government buildings, farms, bridges, and markets were ruined or abandoned. Communities that once sustained themselves were reduced to poverty and fear. Even today, Liberia continues to pay the economic and social price of that devastation.

The economic crimes linked to those years were equally destructive. While ordinary citizens suffered hunger and insecurity, powerful actors allegedly looted national wealth, diverted public resources, and enriched themselves. Corruption after conflict deepens the wounds of war because it steals the recovery victims desperately need. It turns postwar hope into prolonged hardship.

That is why OWECC-L must receive full presidential backing, adequate funding, political protection, and operational cooperation from every ministry and agency. No more confusion over spending plans. No more bureaucratic turf battles. No more public contradictions between institutions of government. If the Executive Mansion truly supports the court, it must compel the machinery of state to move in one direction.

President Boakai still has an opportunity to lead decisively. He can order full coordination, ensure funding compliance, fast-track the harmonized bill, and publicly stand with victims rather than with delay. Liberia’s credibility and conscience are on the line. History will not remember who won bureaucratic arguments in 2026. It will remember whether Liberia finally chose justice over excuses.

The post Boakai Must Stop The Bureaucratic Excuses And Fully Back Liberia’s War Crimes Court Now appeared first on Liberia News Network.

Liberia, through its Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Lewis G. Brown II, has issued a strong warning to the international community over the deepening crisis in Africa’s Great Lakes region, urging urgent and coordinated action to prevent further deterioration. Ambassador Brown delivered the message at the 10136th meeting of the United Nations Security Council on April 15, 2026, speaking on behalf of the A3 bloc.

Representing the A3, comprising Liberia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Somalia, Brown emphasized that instability in the Great Lakes region continues to threaten broader peace across the continent. “There can be no peace in Africa while the Great Lakes region remains unstable,” he declared, underscoring the gravity of the situation before the Council.

The Liberian envoy acknowledged ongoing African-led mediation efforts, commending leaders such as João Lourenço, Faure Gnassingbé, and Yoweri Museveni for their roles in advancing dialogue. However, he cautioned that such initiatives risk failure without unified international backing and consistent follow-through.

Highlighting the limitations of diplomacy without implementation, Brown delivered one of the most striking lines of his address: “Agreements, without credible and collective commitment to implementation, do not build trust. Nor do they stop a single bullet.” The statement reflects growing concern that peace agreements alone are insufficient to halt violence on the ground.

To bridge the gap between commitments and action, the A3 proposed a unified, results-driven implementation framework anchored in the Peace, Security and Cooperation Framework. Brown stressed that this mechanism must include measurable timelines, impartial verification, enforcement measures, and stronger coordination among mediation tracks.

Turning to security developments, Brown warned that the situation in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo is deteriorating at an alarming rate. “The security situation is deteriorating, not incrementally, but dangerously,” he said, calling for an immediate end to hostilities in line with existing UN resolutions and regional agreements.

He also condemned the continued expansion of armed groups and the use of heavy weapons and drones in civilian areas, describing these actions as clear violations of international humanitarian law. “International humanitarian law is not optional. Respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity is non negotiable,” Brown asserted firmly.

On the humanitarian front, Brown painted a dire picture, noting that more than six million people have been displaced across the region. He stressed that the crisis persists not due to a lack of solutions, but because of inadequate funding and limited access to affected populations.

“Humanitarian response cannot rely on sympathy alone. It requires predictable financing, unconditional access, and fair burden sharing,” he told the Council, calling for increased international support to address the worsening humanitarian conditions.

Brown further urged the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees to strengthen collaboration with countries in the region to manage refugee flows and facilitate safe, voluntary, and dignified returns when conditions allow.

Addressing the root causes of the conflict, the Liberian diplomat pointed to the illicit exploitation of natural resources as a key driver of instability. He called for stronger global action to disrupt the economic networks fueling violence, including mechanisms to improve transparency and traceability in the extractive sector.

In closing, Ambassador Brown reaffirmed the A3’s commitment to African-led solutions while urging the international community to match words with action. “The people of the Great Lakes do not need more agreements. They need proof that agreements matter,” he concluded, warning that failure to act decisively risks prolonging instability and missing yet another opportunity for lasting peace.

The post “agreements Do Not Stop A Single Bullet”, Amb. Lewis Brown Warns UN Security Council appeared first on Liberia News Network.

MONROVIA – Gbarpolu County Senator Amara Konneh has called for caution and rigorous scrutiny as the Liberian Senate considers a major currency printing request from the Central Bank of Liberia (CBL), warning that any misstep could have far-reaching consequences for the country’s fragile economy.

Speaking following a joint Senate committee hearing held on Tuesday, April 21, 2026, Konneh said the engagement with the CBL provided “important clarity” on the Bank’s proposal to print additional Liberian dollars. The hearing brought together committees on Banking and Currency, Ways and Means, Finance, and Public Accounts and Audits.

According to Konneh, the CBL Governor acknowledged that beyond routine currency replacement and normal liquidity injections, the Bank is seeking to print an additional L$10 billion to strengthen reserve buffers. He added that the request also includes funding to support liquidity needs for a gold purchase program aimed at boosting Liberia’s reserves.

“This level of transparency is crucial because it helps define the real policy question facing the Legislature,” Konneh stated, emphasizing the importance of understanding the full scope and implications of the request.

The former Finance Minister stressed that lawmakers now face a dual responsibility that is “both technical and moral,” requiring them to strike a careful balance between supporting the operational needs of the monetary authority and protecting ordinary Liberians from economic harm.

“We must balance the operational needs of the monetary authority with the economic realities facing Liberian households,” Konneh said. “If we underfund the Central Bank, we risk liquidity shortages and instability. If we authorize more currency than the economy needs, we risk fueling inflation and eroding purchasing power.”

Drawing on Liberia’s economic history, Konneh warned that excessive monetary expansion often acts as a “silent tax” on citizens, disproportionately affecting wage earners, market women, and small businesses whose incomes struggle to keep pace with rising prices.

At the same time, he cautioned that insufficient liquidity could constrain economic activity, disrupt payment systems, and weaken confidence in the financial sector. He noted that any decision must also align with the country’s broader goal of expanding digital financial services and gradually transitioning toward a less cash-dependent economy.

Based on the Senate’s internal analysis, Konneh revealed that the justified currency need, covering replacement of worn notes, normal injections, and a reasonable reserve buffer, is estimated at around L$60 billion. In contrast, the CBL’s request totals L$79 billion, leaving a gap of approximately L$19 billion.

“This gap does not automatically mean misjudgment or misconduct,” he clarified, “but it raises important questions that must be addressed before the Legislature can responsibly approve such a large monetary expansion.”

Konneh underscored that every additional dollar printed carries consequences, influencing inflation, exchange rates, and the cost of imported goods, while also shaping public confidence in the country’s monetary policy framework.

Placing the issue in a broader context, the senator noted that Liberia is still recovering from multiple economic shocks, including global commodity volatility and structural weaknesses in key sectors such as agriculture and infrastructure. In such an environment, he said, monetary policy must be “carefully calibrated.”

He also highlighted concerns surrounding the CBL’s proposed gold purchase program, noting that while it could strengthen reserves and boost confidence, the liquidity required must be clearly justified and supported by a robust risk management and accountability framework.

Looking ahead, Konneh said the Senate Joint Committee will demand detailed justifications, transparent economic modeling, and safeguards to protect citizens from unintended inflation. He emphasized that lawmakers may need additional time before granting approval.

“Our goal is simple,” Konneh concluded. “We want to support growth, maintain stability, and preserve the purchasing power of the Liberian people.”

The post Konneh Urges Caution As Senate Weighs Cbl’s L$79 Billion Currency Printing Request appeared first on Liberia News Network.

MONROVIA – The Solidarity and Trust for a New Day (STAND) has strongly condemned what it describes as the violent disruption of a peaceful protest organized by the Student Unification Party (SUP) of the University of Liberia, calling the actions of the Liberia National Police (LNP) a “gross abuse of state power” and an attack on democratic freedoms.

In a sharply worded statement, STAND said the protest held under the theme “Jobs and Justice” was a lawful exercise of constitutional rights and should not have been met with force. The group insisted that the response by security forces represents “a flagrant assault on civil liberties and a dangerous erosion of the rule of law.”

According to STAND, credible reports indicate that police used tear gas to disperse unarmed students, resulting in injuries and panic among demonstrators. The organization further alleged that several protesters, including Mr Foday Massaquoi, were arrested and remain in detention.

The statement also raised concern over what it described as continued attempts to track and intimidate participants after the protest, warning that such actions deepen fear and undermine democratic participation.

STAND rejected the justification advanced by authorities that the demonstration was unlawful due to the absence of a permit, describing it as “a deliberate and dangerous distortion of the law.”

Quoting the Constitution, STAND emphasized that “all citizens shall have the right to assemble and consult upon the common good,” arguing that this provision makes peaceful assembly a fundamental and inalienable right that does not require prior state approval.

“The Student Unification Party was under no legal obligation to obtain a permit,” the statement declared, adding that any attempt to criminalize peaceful protest undermines Liberia’s constitutional democracy.

STAND further criticized the conduct of the Liberia National Police, calling it “arbitrary, repressive, and calculated to instill fear and suppress legitimate dissent,” and warned that excessive use of force against students reflects a troubling pattern of intolerance.

The organization also called for the immediate and unconditional release of all detained protesters, including Mr Foday Massaquoi, and demanded an end to all forms of harassment and intimidation against participants in the demonstration.

In addition, STAND pledged to provide legal support to those arrested, stating that it would mobilize competent legal representation to ensure the protection of their constitutional rights and secure their swift release.

Warning against continued repression, STAND said such actions threaten Liberia’s democratic foundations and risk eroding public trust in state institutions, adding that “no amount of intimidation will silence the people or extinguish their resolve.”

The group also called on the Government of Liberia, civil society actors, and the international community to intervene and demand accountability, stressing that the rights of students must be protected rather than suppressed.

Signed by Chairman Mulbah K. Morlu, Jr., STAND reaffirmed its commitment to defending civil liberties, concluding that the voices of Liberia’s students “must not be suppressed—they must be protected, respected, and heard.”

The post Stand Condemns Police Crackdown On Sup Protest, Demands Release Of Detained Students And Accountability appeared first on Liberia News Network.

MONROVIA – The Vanguard Student Unification Party (SUP) of the University of Liberia on Tuesday, April 14, 2026, issued a petition to the Government of Liberia, calling for urgent structural reforms to address what it describes as a deepening national crisis of unemployment, inequality, and injustice.

Addressed to President Joseph Nyuma Boakai, Vice President Jeremiah Kpan Koung, and other top officials of the three branches of government, the petition frames Liberia’s challenges as a “crisis of jobs and justice” affecting millions of citizens, particularly the youth.

“We, the people of Liberia, acting under the banner of the Vanguard Student Unification Party, respectfully present this petition in the popular interest of the Liberian masses,” the group declared, describing itself as an institution rooted in political consciousness and student activism at the University of Liberia.

The SUP argued that the country’s economic hardship is reflected in widespread unemployment, poverty, and lack of opportunity for graduates, stating that “thousands of university graduates roam the streets in search of jobs that are nonexistent.”

It further claimed that Liberia’s development challenges are structural, insisting that economic and governance systems “serve the interest of an elite minority instead of the vast majority of ordinary people.”

The group also highlighted alarming social indicators, including poverty, malnutrition, and stunted growth among children, describing them as evidence of what it called a “superabundance of crises” in the country.

“The March for Jobs and Justice is more than just a march,” SUP declared. “It is an articulation of unsettled grievances and a response to the accumulation of contradictions in society.”

In its petition, the student movement questioned Liberia’s long-standing underdevelopment despite abundant natural resources, asking, “How can a society endowed with vast amounts of natural resources remain wretched and destitute after 179 years?”

SUP also criticized what it described as external influence over Liberia’s economic policy, alleging that international financial institutions play a dominant role in shaping national decisions while limiting domestic policy independence.

The petition invoked constitutional backing, referencing Article 17 of the 1986 Constitution, which guarantees citizens the right to peaceful assembly and petition, as justification for its demands and mobilization.

Among its key demands, SUP called for a comprehensive national employment program that would provide at least US$500 monthly salaries for thousands of Liberians, alongside youth skills development and entrepreneurship support.

The organization also controversially demanded the nationalization of key sectors, including mining, agriculture, logging, fisheries, and banking, arguing that such a move would expand state control over resources and create jobs.

“Liberia’s commanding heights of the economy are owned and controlled by foreign companies,” the petition stated, calling for what it described as economic liberation and resource sovereignty.

SUP further demanded a 50 percent reduction in salaries of top government officials, including the President, Vice President, lawmakers, and judges, while calling for equivalent increases for civil servants, teachers, doctors, nurses, and military personnel.

The student group also urged the government to allocate at least 10 percent of the national budget to agriculture in line with the Maputo Declaration, saying this would boost food security and job creation.

On governance and justice, SUP called for the prompt and transparent investigation of human rights abuses, insisting that perpetrators must be held accountable without delay or political interference.

It further demanded an end to what it described as politically motivated actions against Montserrado County District #10 Representative Yekeh Kolubah, warning of potential mass citizen action if such measures continue.

The petition also called for comprehensive reforms to the justice system, including the prosecution of individuals accused in rape and sexual violence cases, while ensuring protection and support for survivors.

Additionally, SUP demanded the modernization of the University of Liberia and called on the Liberia National Police to refrain from what it termed brutality against peaceful students and citizens.

“We emphasize that this petition should not be mistaken for rhetoric,” SUP stated. “These are concrete manifestations of structural conditions undermining the dignity and future of our society.”

The group reaffirmed its commitment to peaceful civic engagement but warned that continued inaction by government authorities could lead to heightened public resistance.

“As history shows, when legitimate grievances are ignored, the consequences shape the trajectory of nations,” the petition warned. “If our demands are ignored, we can guarantee that we will come out more forcefully.”

The statement was signed by SUP Secretary-General Cde. David Howard Jr and approved by Chairman Cde. Odecious Mulbah, concluding with the rallying cry: “Long live the massescracy. Long live SUP.”

The post Sup Issues “jobs And Justice” Petition, Demands Economic Overhaul And Gov’t Reform appeared first on Liberia News Network.

MONROVIA – A constitutional debate has unfolded, with legal professor Cllr. Tiawan Saye Gongloe and Montserrado County District #3 Representative Sumo Mulbah presenting opposing interpretations of the law over calls to sanction Montserrado County #10 Representative Yekeh Kolubah.

The dispute, triggered by a petition reportedly linked to the Liberia National Police Inspector General, has sparked a national conversation about the limits of legislative authority, the role of the judiciary, and the protection of constitutional order.

In his widely circulated commentary, Gongloe described attempts to impeach or expel Kolubah over alleged treason as a fundamental legal error, insisting that such matters fall strictly within the jurisdiction of the courts.

“Treason is a criminal offense, not a political accusation,” Gongloe asserted, emphasizing that the appropriate response is “arrest, charge, and prosecution before a court of competent jurisdiction.”

He warned that any attempt by the House of Representatives of Liberia to determine criminal guilt would represent a dangerous overreach, undermining the doctrine of separation of powers enshrined in Liberia’s Constitution.

According to Gongloe, using impeachment or expulsion as a substitute for criminal prosecution would blur the distinction between political authority and judicial responsibility, setting a troubling precedent for governance.

Drawing on his experience as former Solicitor General, Gongloe pointed out that even sitting lawmakers accused of crimes were prosecuted through the courts, not removed through legislative maneuvers. “That is how accountability works in a constitutional democracy,” he stressed.

He further cautioned that allowing political considerations to override legal procedures risks weakening democratic institutions. “Politics without the control of the law is chaos,” Gongloe declared.

On the issue of free speech, Tiawan Saye Gongloe argued that controversial statements, including those perceived as offensive or unpatriotic, do not automatically constitute treason, noting that democratic systems must tolerate dissent.

He cited Bernie Sanders as an example of a lawmaker who has openly criticized government actions without facing criminal accusations, reinforcing the importance of protecting freedom of expression.

Gongloe also proposed a measured approach to the controversy, calling on President Joseph Nyuma Boakai to establish an independent commission of inquiry to investigate the claims linked to Kolubah.

He referenced the precedent of William R. Tolbert following the 1979 Rice Riots, arguing that such a process would ensure transparency and adherence to the rule of law.

However, Representative Sumo Mulbah has strongly rejected Gongloe’s position, offering a detailed rebuttal grounded in constitutional interpretation and legislative authority.

“While the judiciary maintains the power to admit and discipline attorneys and members, this does not preclude the legislature from her mandate to suspend and expel members with cause and due process,” Sumo Mulbah wrote.

He argued that Gongloe’s analysis overlooks the critical distinction between criminal prosecution and legislative discipline, maintaining that the Legislature retains the authority to regulate its own membership.

In his rebuttal, Sumo emphasized that expulsion is an internal disciplinary mechanism designed to preserve the dignity and functionality of the legislative body, separate from the quasi-judicial process of impeachment.

He traced the historical roots of impeachment to the English Parliament, explaining that modern democratic systems, including those modeled after the United States, recognize expulsion as a legitimate legislative power.

Citing Article 38 of Liberia’s Constitution, Sumo noted that each House has the authority to determine its own rules and punish members for disorderly behavior, including expulsion with a two-thirds majority.

“The act is regarded as a formal exercise of the House’s internal governance,” Sumo explained, stressing that such decisions are inherently political and legislative in nature.

He further argued that courts traditionally refrain from interfering in internal legislative matters due to the doctrine of parliamentary privilege and the classification of such issues as political questions.

However, Sumo acknowledged that judicial oversight is not entirely excluded, noting that courts may intervene if the Legislature violates constitutional provisions or denies a member due process.

Turning to the role of the Inspector General, Sumo defended the legality of petitioning the Legislature, citing Article 15 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to petition the government.

He maintained that in matters of national security, it is both appropriate and necessary for the executive branch to engage the Legislature, particularly when the conduct of elected officials is involved.

“When the Inspector General identifies activities that may undermine national security, the petition serves as a formal mechanism to invoke legislative oversight,” Sumo Mulbah argued.

He also highlighted the procedural safeguards within the House, noting that petitions are reviewed through committee systems before reaching the plenary, ensuring that decisions are not arbitrary.

According to Sumo, this structured process demonstrates that legislative action is not merely political, but grounded in constitutional procedure and institutional responsibility.

Despite their differences, both Tiawan Saye Gongloe and Sumo Mulbah agree on one point the need to protect Liberia’s democratic framework. However, they sharply diverge on how that framework should be applied in the Kolubah case.

The post Gongloe, Sumo Square Off Over Kolubah Controversy As Debate On Law And Legislative Power Intensifies appeared first on Liberia News Network.

MONROVIA – April 14 remains one of the most symbolically referenced dates in Liberia’s modern political memory, closely associated with the 1979 Rice Riots, a mass uprising that reshaped the country’s political trajectory and exposed deep tensions between government policy and public hardship.

Although not an official national holiday, the events surrounding April 1979 continue to be revisited as a defining moment in Liberia’s history, when economic grievances over the proposed increase in the price of rice, Liberia’s staple food, sparked nationwide unrest.

The immediate cause of the crisis was a government decision under the administration of President William R. Tolbert Jr. to raise the price of a 100-pound bag of imported rice from US$22 to US$26. The policy was officially intended to encourage local rice production and reduce dependency on imports. However, many citizens viewed the decision as profiteering by political elites, with widespread suspicion directed toward senior officials, including members of the presidential circle.

What began as a planned peaceful demonstration quickly escalated into chaos. The Progressive Alliance of Liberia (PAL), a political advocacy group active at the time, had initially organized a march to protest the rice price increase. However, on April 14, 1979, the protest spiraled into widespread riots and destruction of property across Monrovia as tensions intensified and crowds swelled beyond control.

The situation rapidly deteriorated as clashes broke out between protesters and security forces. Government troops responded with force, firing on demonstrators in an attempt to restore order. In response to the escalating crisis, President Tolbert reportedly sought assistance from neighboring Guinea to help stabilize the situation and reinforce security.

In the aftermath of the violence, the government took emergency measures to restore calm. Schools were closed, several organizers and activists were arrested, and the administration temporarily reduced the price of rice to US$20 in an effort to appease public anger and prevent further unrest.

Among the most influential figures in the broader political environment were reformist voices such as Gabriel Baccus Matthews, associated with growing opposition politics, and Togba-Nah Tipoteh, whose economic critiques of inequality and governance helped shape public debate at the time. Activist movements such as the Movement for Justice in Africa (MOJA) also played a role in mobilizing political consciousness, particularly among students and young people, even though the riots themselves were not centrally coordinated by any single organization.

The 1979 Rice Riots ultimately marked a turning point in Liberia’s history. The events severely destabilized the administration of President Tolbert and exposed deep structural tensions within the state. Many historians view the riots as a direct precursor to the military coup of April 12, 1980, which overthrew the government and fundamentally altered Liberia’s political landscape.

In the days following the unrest, the country experienced heightened political tension, economic disruption, and a growing sense of uncertainty about the future of civilian rule. The crisis highlighted the fragile relationship between government policy decisions and public trust, particularly in times of economic hardship.

Today, the events of April 14, 1979, are remembered not simply as a protest over rice prices, but as a broader expression of public frustration over inequality, governance, and exclusion. The riots stand as one of the most consequential moments in Liberia’s modern history.

April 1979 remains a turning point in Liberia’s national story, defined by a convergence of economic grievance, political activism, and state response that reshaped the country’s historical trajectory and set the stage for profound political change.

The post April 14 And The Rice Riots Of 1979: Liberia’s Turning Point Of Economic Anger And Political Awakening appeared first on Liberia News Network.

MONROVIA – Joseph Nyuma Boakai has triggered a wave of national debate following the submission of a US$45 million draft supplementary budget to the National Legislature, a move the government says is aimed at strengthening public service delivery and accelerating development under its policy agenda.

The proposal, submitted Monday, April 13, 2026 through the Ministry of Finance and Development Planning, seeks to adjust the national budget in line with Liberia’s Public Financial Management Law, which permits mid-year revisions to address emerging priorities. The funding package outlines allocations across several sectors, including justice, security, education, health, and infrastructure.

According to the breakdown, US$1.5 million is earmarked for the Ministry of Justice to strengthen border response, while the National Security Agency is set to receive US$2.5 million. The defense sector is allocated US$600,000 for recruitment and logistics, while the education and health sectors are assigned US$7.3 million and US$10.9 million respectively.

Public Administration emerges as the single largest beneficiary, receiving US$11.4 million, followed by infrastructure and basic services at US$7.16 million. Agriculture, however, is allocated just US$500,000, raising eyebrows among critics who argue that the sector remains central to Liberia’s long-term economic recovery.

The financing structure of the supplementary budget has also drawn scrutiny. Of the total amount, US$40 million is derived from previously undisbursed World Bank budget support for 2025, while only US$5 million comes from what the government describes as domestic revenue over-performance.

Political commentator Patrick M’bayo has emerged as one of the most vocal critics, dismissing the proposal as “a political spending instrument with no development spine.” His critique underscores growing concerns that the budget prioritizes government consumption over transformative investment.

M’bayo argues that nearly 64 percent of the proposed spending is directed toward administrative and recurrent expenses rather than infrastructure and production. He contends that this approach neglects the everyday struggles of ordinary Liberians, particularly those in underserved communities lacking access to roads, safe drinking water, and reliable electricity.

He further criticized the allocation pattern, noting that Public Administration alone consumes over a quarter of the total budget, surpassing critical sectors like agriculture, energy, and commerce. In his view, such prioritization reflects what he describes as “economic illiteracy” in a country where food insecurity, weak markets, and limited industrial growth persist.

Specific line items within the proposal have also fueled public frustration. These include US$4.015 million for yellow machine deployment, US$3 million for buses for the University of Liberia and local groups, and US$750,000 for Independence Day celebrations. Additional allocations include US$2 million to support Liberia’s role at the United Nations Security Council and US$800,000 for special presidential projects.

The expenditures have raised concerns about a disconnect between government spending and the pressing needs of citizens in densely populated and underserved communities like West Point and New Kru Town, where access to basic services remains severely limited.

Even allocations to the health and education sectors have not escaped scrutiny. Political commentator Patrick M’bayo notes that much of the funding is directed toward payroll adjustments, arrears, and operational costs rather than systemic reforms, raising concerns about long-term sustainability and planning deficiencies.

Despite the backlash, the government has defended the proposal. Acting Finance Minister Anthony G. Myers, who presented the draft on behalf of Minister Augustine Kpehe Ngafuan, emphasized that the budget reflects both external support and improved domestic revenue performance.

Meanwhile, House Speaker Richard N. Koon has welcomed the submission, praising the administration for prioritizing social sector investments. He specifically highlighted planned support for a National Children’s Hospital and the University of Liberia as meaningful steps toward improving access to essential services.

If approved, the supplementary budget will increase Liberia’s 2026 national budget from approximately US$1.25 billion to US$1.29 billion, representing a 3.6 percent increase. While the government frames the adjustment as a step toward accelerated development, the sharp criticism it has drawn signals a deepening national conversation about fiscal priorities, accountability, and the true beneficiaries of public spending.

The post Us$45m Supplementary Budget Triggers Controversy As Joseph Boakai’s Allocations Slammed appeared first on Liberia News Network.